Handbag

Nicole Ritchie with an enormous Balenciaga bag

From famous Hollywood handbag owners like Nicole Ritchie or Grace Kelly to the homeless bag lady, who has no name and no place, bags have power. I suggest that this power lies in their holding capacities—capacities that are both literal and symbolic.

Grace Kelly had a Hermes bag named after her.

Homeless woman in Sydney

Holding powers are dimensions of technology and material culture not yet well examined. I’m thinking about them using Zoë Sofoulis’ theory of Containment. Building on the work of Mumford & Heidegger, Sofoulis argues that containment defines both the tool or object and its function. It is about space and what space holds. She reminds us that unlike hand-tools or machines that require power to work, basic containers can function unaided, as stand-alone holding devices or conduits. As such they readily retreat to the background of our awareness, but, crucially, they are the technologies that precede all others.

Today I’m going to use Container Theory to talk about handbags, suggesting that handbags are political, and play a crucial part in helping to structure, express & define certain kinds of femininity.

The ‘Iceman’, a neolithic traveler at least 5000 years old, found in the Austrian Alps in 1991, wore a leather beltpouch that held his flints, needles and other small tools.  Men and women have probably always carried small leather sacks or cloth purses for all sorts of purposes, from seed distribution to safekeeping of relics or talismans. But the handbag as we know it is a distinctly 20th Century object. The ‘age of handbags’ began in the early 1900s and is closely connected to women beginning to move more freely within the public sphere and thus to the rise of capitalism and modernity. Flaneuses (what is the plural?), window shoppers, strollers through shopping arcades, needed not only something in which to carry their money but also something to carry the items necessary to present a correct public face. So right from the start handbags were designed to carry lipsticks and mirrored compacts as well as money and keys (and in my planned larger version of this paper I talk about makeup inside the handbag too).

The handbag really came to the fore as a fashion item in the 1920s, when flappers ventured out into the social world without their mothers or male companions.  Little bags became essential. Originally an upper class necessity, the handbag quickly became a symbol of women’s independence. Griselda Pollock reminds us that ‘going out in public and the idea of disgrace were closely allied’ (Vision and Difference , 1988 p. 69). The handbag announced self-sufficiency and mobility and offered some sort of protection from potential disgrace—it symbolically allowed the new woman to be wherever she wanted, unencumbered by chaperones.

It seems that like many things that are part of the performance of femininity handbags are subject to complex and contradictory feminist responses. For example, Germaine Greer asks: ‘Why do women always carry bags, and why are those bags so often heavy? Why is it that most women will not go out of the house without bags loaded with objects of no immediate use? Is the tote bag an exterior uterus, the outward sign of the unmentionable burden?’ Some of you will have noticed the current fashion for enormous handbags—it seems that the skinnier and more toned the celebrity the bigger and floppier and more elaborate her designer tote will be.  Perhaps as she is more and more exposed in the media her bag gets bigger and bigger to show that she retains some secrets.  And there is something taboo about the inside of someone’s bag—you shouldn’t go rummaging about in there if it’s not yours—Farid Chenoune, a curator of handbags at the Museum of Decorative Arts in Paris, says that the similarity between an haute couture tote and a satchel belonging to an African witch is that both bags hold a secret of some sort: ‘what you put in your bag is very important to you. That makes a bag very personal, because in it you have a secret. A secret gives you some sort of power’.

The Iron Lady and her handbag

I suggest that one of the things the handbag does is work as a mobile and material link between private and public: it powerfully connects domestic and civil worlds—literally bringing the home into the public and the outside world into the home, often working as a vital facilitator between the two. Margaret Thatcher’s square black bag—auctioned a couple of years ago on ebay for £100,000—is an infamous symbol of powerful and conservative ‘homemaker’ femininity literally at work in the public sphere.  It is a symbol of a very specific kind of authority—one that is adamantly un-manly—Thatcher’s handbag’s role could never have been filled by a briefcase. So long as she kept that big black thing attached to her elbow she hung on to a static and respectable femininity or womanliness that allowed her to impinge on traditional masculine territories partly because it was so conservative.

The handbag can easily be seen as a sort of external womb—as a metaphor for this organ it is then about holding, storage, supply, safe passage, and transformation. Holding is neither passive nor simple. Sofoulis explains how holding is active.  Her example is a jug.  As a container, a little brown jug has two activities or capacities—to take in fluid, and to keep that fluid. But perhaps more importantly, these capacities facilitate a third activity—which is to give back: the jug’s purpose is to give back that which it has taken and held—its rationale is only fully realized once its contents gush out. In the same way, the handbag takes in and keeps the objects within it.  And its purpose is also to give back.  Unlike the jug its contents tend not to gush out, except for those embarrassing moments when we need to tip everything out in order to locate the urgently ringing phone.  Rather, handbags offer us a sporadic flow of ‘gifts’ throughout the day. And really, these are gifts to ourselves, via the bag—they might be in the form of music, reading material, nibbles, drinks, money, lotions, pens and papers… there is nothing more comforting than a well-organised handbag which generously and in a timely manner offers forth its contents in order to facilitate the running of a busy day.  In this way then, the handbag is a technology of containment that, in Foucauldian terms, practically assists in the care of the self.

What rests within the bag is private and personal, while its outside is like a billboard, advertising one’s place in the world. The handbag is a portable domestic lifeworld—a way to take the indoors outdoors, a way to reconcile private and public spheres. Handbags play key roles in the projection, performance, and protection of a ‘feminine’ mode of being.  They are containers for the self.

14 Responses to “Handbag”

  1. elsewhere Says:

    Great post. Some of those skinny celebrities could fit inside their own bags. Don’t they worry about posture? Still I guess they’re doing all that pilates & yoga.

    I always thought one of the reasons for handbags was not to destroy the ‘line’ of one’s image, a bit like the VPL thing. Whereas men are quite happy to walk round with bulging pockets etc (increase appearance of size). Or maybe not having to carry anything is a sign of autonomy and the capacity to launch into action at any time (not that they often do!)

  2. phil Says:

    I’ve never had a handbag. Trying to understand

  3. Digital Moments in Art » Blog Archive » Quick scan of the net – celebrities exposed Says:

    […] http://thecarriageheldbutjustourselves.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/handbag-as-an-artifact-for-containme…Perhaps as she is more and more exposed in the media her bag gets bigger and bigger to show that she retains some secrets. And there is something taboo about the inside of someone’s bag—you shouldn’t go rummaging about in there if it’s not … Some of those skinny celebrities could fit inside their own bags. Don’t they worry about posture? Still I guess they’re doing all that pilates & yoga. I always thought one of the reasons for handbags was not to destroy the ‘line’ of … […]

  4. Meredith Jones Says:

    Phil you should have one, your world will change.

  5. Deborah Says:

    really liked the notion of handbag as care of the self. as a satchel and backpage user i think i have not valued that highly enough…
    however, have some query about your universalisation of women and class and culture. your reference point seems to be fin de siecle consumer culture in France (flaneuse). yet the English working class woman always had to go out and work, unaccompanied by mother or companion – say, a servant, or a flowerseller, as did the French peasant. and that’s only the tip of the iceberg – what about India? i think clarifying the highly commodified aspect of the C20th handbag AND its users (both products of the late C19th bourgeoise) is going to make your argument about the modern construction and production of femininity more convincing.

  6. Deborah Says:

    i guess this is the line which i think is the one that needs clarification:
    ‘closely connected to women beginning to move more freely within the public sphere and thus to the rise of capitalism and modernity’..

    btw,your other observation i enjoyed is that the handbag is like a portable makeover. all those scenes in movies where the girl/woman does a quick costume and role change thanks to what’s in her handbag.

  7. Meredith Jones Says:

    Thanks for the comments everyone. I think this is maybe a really good thing to do pre-publication with some of my papers.

    Deborah I totally see your point. I thought about the “middle class white women” clause but felt better leaving it out of this little version of the paper. Sometimes it seems so cursory to put those disclaimers in, and although I know it’s politically correct it feels hypocritical. But the way you’ve suggested I go about it is really helpful and I think will be a great way forward — thank you my clever friend.

  8. ufcfactory.com Says:

    The pack also offers features that should be considered carefully. Some of them come from a zipper, although some come with snap closure. If you are not familiar with the snap, then you look at the zipper. The characteristics of the material must match your needs. If you do not want pockets on the outside, then you’re looking for bags that come with pockets on the inside only.

  9. Marshall Stacks Says:

    noting that Mrs thatcher’s reticule is of crocodile skin, I wonder she may have killed it herself.

  10. Electric Oven Says:

    we have a great variety of hand tools at home, we always buy it from the local home depot ,”-

  11. About Time and Elegance : Purses and Dresses | Says:

    […] via thecarriageheldbutjustourselves & […]

  12. Rich Malekan Says:

    Very best wishes pertaining to fantastic weblog posting! I recognized this publish instead interesting, It??¥s my impression you could possibly be an perfect author. When i enclosed ones website to suit your needs for your arrange represents and may possibly pay a visit to within forthcoming. I have to inspire yourself to carry on who splendid give excellent outcomes, have a fairly splendid operating day!

  13. Glmgdrct Says:

    medieval heraldry,

  14. kataskeyh eshop Says:

    I believe this internet site holds some really great info for everyone :D. “The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms.” by Henri Frdric Amiel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: